Introduction: Modi's Attempt to Reduce States' Share

In a startling revelation, a recent report by The Reporters' Collective has brought to light Prime Minister Narendra Modi's alleged covert maneuver in 2014 to diminish states' access to funds. This exposé, published in Al Jazeera, details how Modi attempted to negotiate a reduction in the states' share of central taxes, setting off a cascade of events that would have far-reaching implications.

The Backdoor Negotiations: Modi's Attempt to Reduce States' Share

Shortly after assuming office, Modi sought to curtail the states' financial autonomy through off-the-record negotiations with the Finance Commission of India. The Commission, led by Y.V. Reddy at the time, resisted the pressure from the Modi government, forcing them to reconsider their budgetary allocations.

Budgetary Fallout: Modi's Attempt to Reduce States' Share

The Finance Commission's resolute stance compelled the Modi government to hastily revise its initial budget within 48 hours. The intended reduction of the states' share from the recommended 42% to a mere 33% did not materialize, preventing a potential blow to welfare programs and public services.

Behind Closed Doors: Modi's Attempt to Reduce States' Share

B.V.R. Subrahmanyam, CEO of NITI Aayog, disclosed the clandestine negotiations in a talk organized by the Centre for Social and Economic Progress. He emphasized the opacity surrounding Union government budgets, noting layers of attempts to obfuscate the truth.

Constitutional Breach: Modi's Attempt to Reduce States' Share

The alleged off-record parleys by the Prime Minister breached constitutional propriety. The Finance Commission, a constitutional body, is designated to provide independent recommendations, leaving no room for informal negotiations.

Resistance and Resolution: Modi's Attempt to Reduce States' Share

Despite a two-hour tripartite discussion involving Modi, Reddy, and Subrahmanyam, the Finance Commission's recommendations of a 42% share for states prevailed. Reddy's unyielding stance, as recalled by Subrahmanyam, showcased the Commission's commitment to its constitutional mandate.

Parliamentary Deception: Modi's Attempt to Reduce States' Share

Following the failed negotiations, Modi, in a surprising move, chose not to disclose these events in parliament. On February 27, 2015, he proclaimed a commitment to states' enrichment, concealing the attempted reduction and the subsequent budgetary revisions.

Implications and Reflection: Modi's Attempt to Reduce States' Share

The allegations, if true, raise significant concerns about federalism, transparency, and the potential erosion of democratic norms. The centralization of power and attempts to influence constitutionally mandated bodies challenge the delicate balance between the center and the states.

Government Denials and Public Scrutiny: Modi's Attempt to Reduce States' Share

While the Modi government vehemently denies these allegations, dismissing them as fabrications, the need for a thorough investigation and transparent dialogue remains. Citizens play a crucial role in demanding accountability and ensuring the continued strength of India's federal structure.

Conclusion: Modi's Attempt to Reduce States' Share

The murky details surrounding Modi's alleged attempts to alter states' share of central taxes in 2014 underscore the importance of upholding constitutional principles, transparency, and the autonomy of vital institutions like the Finance Commission. Informed citizens must remain vigilant, fostering open dialogue and holding leaders accountable to sustain the democratic fabric of the nation.

Written By: Muktar